2000P Errata Race County SOS Diff --------------------------------------- 01. Alameda TOTREG 640973 640975 -2 02. Alpine SENREP01 19 199 -180 see notes below SENREP03 199 19 180 " " " 03. Amador PR14YES 5438 6438 -1000 see notes below PR30YES 2918 2855 63 " " " PR30NO 9526 9313 213 " " " PR31YES 2709 2607 102 " " " PR31NO 9611 9226 385 " " " 06. Colusa TOTREG 7135 7130 5 07. Contra Costa TOTREG 458136 457508 628 08. Napa TOTREG 12776 12771 5 CNGREP01 697 367 330 10. Fresno numerous small variances 13. Imperial TOTREG 47632 47639 -7 TOTVOTE 21690 28088 -6398 14. Inyo TOTREG 9594 9593 1 16. Kings TOTREG 41990 41953 37 18. Lassen TOTREG 12920 12902 18 20. Madera PRSDEMLIB01 1 2 -1 PRSDEMREF02 13 14 -1 PRSREPREP02 8901 8902 -1 PRSDEMNLP01 0 1 -1 PRSDEMNLP02 5 8 -3 PRSREPNLP02 2 6 -4 PRSREPNLP03 2 4 -2 PRSREPNLP04 0 1 -1 22. Mariposa TOTREG 10124 10125 -1 24. Merced TOTREG 78570 78466 104 26. Mono TOTREG 5762 5999 -237 SENREP01 83 1417 -1334 see notes below SENREP02 135 83 52 " " " SENREP03 1417 135 1282 " " " 27. Monterey TOTREG 145819 145705 114 PRSREPLIB03 87 72 15 see notes below PRSREPLIB06 26 6 20 " " " PRSREPGRN03 72 88 -16 " " " PRSREPGRN06 6 26 -20 " " " PRSREPREP03 10602 10601 1 " " " 29. Nevada TOTVOTE 37655 37973 -318 30. Orange CD 48 race all candidates see notes below 31. Placer USSREP04 824 823 1 32. Plumas CNGREP01 5506 247 5259 see notes below CNGNLP01 248 5460 -5212 " " " numerous other small variances as well " " " 33. Riverside CD 48 race all candidates see notes below 36. San Bernardino SENDEM01 54541 52001 2540 SENREP01 44401 41227 3174 37. San Diego CD 48 race all candidates see notes below 38. San Francisco PRSDEMAIP01 414 415 -1 see notes below 42. Santa Barbara TOTVOTE 116322 114814 1508 43. Santa Cruz PRSREP03 85020 85022 -2 PRSREPREP03 49322 49323 -1 PRSREPDCL03 12010 12011 -1 50. Stanislaus TOTREG 185558 185556 2 51. Sutter USSREP05 2847 2747 100 53. Trinity TOTREG 7488 7500 -12 54. Tulare TOTREG 117913 117924 -11 56. Ventura TOTVOTE 199489 199544 -55 57. Yolo TOTREG 75204 75200 4 58. Yuba USSAIP01 121 76 45 see notes below SENREP01 628 5501 -4873 " " " SENREP02 473 628 -155 " " " SENREP03 5501 473 5028 " " " Notes: ------ 02. Alpine sos appears to have transposed the totals for two candidates for this race. 03. Amador believed to be sos errors, as no keypunching errors could be found; however, county did not provide any totals to compare against sos totals, so reason for the differences is uncomfirmed. 26. Mono sos appears to have transposed the totals for three candidates for this race. 27. Monterey it appears as though the sos has switched the totals for two candidates (McCain & Keyes) by partisan race breakdown. lib totals were entered as grn, and vice versa. there also appear to be a couple a couple of typos in the sos totals resulting in difs of 1 vote. no explanation for the dif in the TOTREG figures. 32. Plumas sos totals do not match county totals in almost every instance. totals for two candidates appear to be transposed. otherwise it appears that sos wasn't working from the county's final sov. 38. San Francisco county and sos agree total should be 415, yet the county's data appears to add up to only 414. not confirmed manually. 48. Yuba sos appears to have picked up incorrect totals for these candidates. in the case of the SD race, they appear to have mixed the totals up. 30. Orange there is a problem with the candidate codes. the program does not seem to like that there are ten republican candidates, and bombs on this race. 33. Riverside there is a problem with the candidate codes. the program does not seem to like that there are ten republican candidates, and bombs on this race. 37. Riverside there is a problem with the candidate codes. the program does not seem to like that there are ten republican candidates, and bombs on this race.